On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 08:22:08PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Package: libatlas3-base,libcblas3 > Version: libatlas3-base/3.10.3-4 > Version: libcblas3/3.2.1+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > User: trei...@debian.org > Usertags: edos-file-overwrite > > Date: 2017-09-09 > Architecture: amd64 > Distribution: sid
> automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the > same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has > detected the following problem: > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/libcblas3_3.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcblas.so.3', which is also > in package libatlas3-base:amd64 3.10.3-4 > Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.24-17) ... > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libcblas3_3.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.deb > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) First, note that the problem has appeared because I have multiarchified atlas, and therefore the libcblas.so.3 that it provides has moved from /usr/lib to /usr/lib/<multiarch>. But in a sense the situation was already problematic before that change , because two libraries with the same SONAME were in the dynamic linker search path. Same reasoning for #874803. Now, I think there are two options for fixing this issue: - completely dropping libcblas3 (and libcblas-dev). These two packages are actually useless, because they provide the same C interface to BLAS than the other BLAS implementations (libblas3, libatlas3-base, libopenblas-base), but in a less optimized way; - or making the two packages conflict. Andreas (and others), what do you think? Best, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
