Hi Martin!
On 9 September 2017 at 18:18, W. Martin Borgert <deba...@debian.org> wrote: > On 2017-09-09 21:04, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: >> = Porting = >> >> Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we >> know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less >> painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4. > > If I understand the various posts in the FreeCAD forums correct, > they seem to go for PySide2. It would be very helpful, if the > Debian Qt maintainers could package PySide2! Maybe before Qt4 is > removed, because otherwise some packages have to be removed just > to introduce them again. I don't think that packaging PySide2 > outside of the Qt team makes sense, because PySide2 will be the > "official" Python API of Qt, if I'm not mistaken. > -- > "Furthermore, I consider that PySide2 must be packaged" -- Qt the Elder So far no one in the team is interested in PySide2 and our current manpower does not allows us to even take it as a pet package. I don't know if asking upstream to use PyQt5 (which is kind of more official) would be a good idea, else someone needs to step up to maintain PySide2. Of course [s]he is welcomed in the team to do that! Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
