Hi Jose, On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 04:48:26PM +0100, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > It is more convenient if you open an RFS bug (if you did its missing on > > the SoB page[1]) to enable discussion. So I move it here to the > > maintainers list. > > Oh, forgot it, sorry.
No problem - just remember it next time. ;-) > > Your package is also featuring the "most hated" > > boilerplate in debian/rules file and so I decided to start my fight > > against it and added a condition 5 which needs to be fullfilled if you > > want me to sponsor your package. ;-) > > hehe, removed. Its good that I had this idea to add it to the Wiki today. :-P > > As an additional note: I started using debhelper 10 and I'm now > > switching to debhelper 11 since its available in testing. If you have > > good reasons to stick to compat level 9 that is fine for me but may be > > you just did not realised the potential compat level bump. > > > > I don't have any good reason not to use the latest debhelper available, > change to level 11. I added this to the changelog and also removed --parallel from d/rules since from compat level debhelper 10 this is default. > Our usual buildfarm says seems to be happy with the current build, no > lintian warns or errors, autopkg happy: > https://build.osrfoundation.org/view/All/job/ignition-math2-pkg_builder-master-debian_sid-amd64/61/ > > Any other improvement proposal is very welcome Andreas. I also removed the -dbg package which is autogenerated and needs no manual declaration. Just commited (please make sure you also get the new tag which I changed in remote repository). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
