Package: dh-r Version: 20171201 X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:12:09PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 04:44:11PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > Actually, I am wrong: epochs are very wrong for CRAN packages, because they > > break dh-r which (I think) is then not able to generate the right versioned > > dependency… > > Uhmmm. I did not intend to break anything - but we should file a bug > report against dh-r. Would you mind doing this since you realised > what is broken? Essentially dh-r should query the package database to figure out which CRAN packages have an epoch, and adapt its generated versioned dependencies. Unfortunately that means that dh-r will no longer be fully functional offline (querying the local apt cache could be a fallback, but there's no guarantee that it is up-to-date, even when running unstable). -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers