Hi, David Bremner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2008-05-06 11:23:34) :
> Speaking as the maintainer of all packages in pkg-science ( all 3 :-) > ), I don't mind any sort of merging plan. But I understood from > previous mails from C. Prudhomme that he (and others?) preferred to > keep pkg-scicomp a more focussed effort on scientific computation (in > the computer science usage of that term). This is what I understood too: http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2008/01/msg00043.html > If that is an accurate > statement (Christophe?) then using pkg-science as the umbrella group > seems to be consistent with the original intent. It is not completely > reasonable to compare the activity in pkg-scicomp and pkg-science > since the latter is much younger. Christophe, is pkg-scicomp suitable for Andreas plans? http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2008/05/msg00022.html With respect to the packaging policy http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2008/05/msg00029.html (for pkg-science or whatever it turns into), for the sake of simplicity, I would suggest to adopt and adapt the Debian Med existing policy: http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html Please, people in charge (Christophe, Sylvestre), clarify those questions. And as I already stated in http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2008/01/msg00035.html I would be happy to join whichever group. Best regards, Frédéric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
