Le Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:30:04PM +0100, Chris Walker a écrit : > > Is kst [A KDE application used for displaying scientific data] incorrectly > tagged?
In my opinion, yes. The drawback with Debtags is that tagging is anonymous, so we can't discuss with the person who tagged kst Field::Chemistry. But I would suggest asking the maintainer and CCing Debichem to confirm that this tag can be removed. > Can someone explain the rationale for having both field::biology and > biology::*. Unfortunately, they stem from a disagreement between me and the Debtags team. I wanted a Suite::EMBOSS and a few works-with and works-with-format tags related to biology, and they objected that it was too specialised. They created the biology::facet instead. I do not think that I want to use it. Here is the complete discussion. http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2007-September/001680.html I will go through the packages relevant to Debian Med and reopen the discussion with solid numbers about how many packages would use this or that proposed tag. Have a nice day, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]