On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:19:11AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 16:47 -0800, Nicholas Breen wrote: > > * is it too late in the release cycle to propose this as a release goal? > > should squeeze+1 be the target instead? squeeze+2? > > I think it's too late for squeeze, but squeeze+1 should definitely be > doable.
How many packages are affected? Squeeze freeze is several months away still. I am not sure about release-goal freeze, but even then, it could be considered an inofficial release goal among debian-science at least. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
