On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Michael Banck <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:45:30AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> I tried to simplify the lintian override to the minimum one. But I am >> not sure why those are here (maybe because paraview use a convienient >> copy of VTK -for good reasons-). > > Can you summarize why this is? Looking at the upstreams (Kitware seems > to be upstream for both VTK and ParaView), this seems surprising.
Back in the old days ParaView would use a hardlink (or symlink I can't remember) to VTK CVS tree. Now using git it seems I can do that more gracefully (look at VTK dir): http://paraview.org/gitweb?p=ParaView.git;a=tree I think paraview really need a VTK from a special paraview-branch. -- Mathieu Ps: I can't find the thread about this specific subject on debian but I do remember seeing it at some point... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
