btw... have you ran across pybtex -- it has its "own" yaml format handler (if I read it right cant import/export to .bib): http://pybtex.sourceforge.net/features.html which might become your native choice for upstream-metadata.yaml ?
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:48:12AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > > - For the Blends task files, I will remove bibliographic information > > > after it > > > is transferred to the UDD and the web sentinel generators are adapted > > > to > > > this. > > Just to make sure I understand you correctly: You will try to collect > > the bibliographic information from Yaroslav's proposed BibTeX files into > > UDD? This is fine for me as well - just asking because your intention > > is not fully clear. > Hi Andreas, > I will add a debian/ustream-metadata.yaml files to the packages for which > I remove the bibliographic info from the tasks pages. > The BibTex files may contain more than one reference, and it is not possible > to > know which one to put forward. Unless of course we make a convention that the > first > one is always the recommended one. > In that case, we could think about gathering the information directly from > debian/references instead. The main obstacle would be to write the code. > Ideally, I would hope to find a Perl module like BibTeX::Parser, but that > accepts a variable or an URL instead of a filehandle. > Have a nice day, > Cheers, -- =------------------------------------------------------------------= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110111144152.gx27...@onerussian.com
