Hi Oliver, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 06:49:53PM +0100, Oliver Lindemann wrote: > yes, I'm basically interested to get exypriment distributed through > Debian. Joining the Debian Science team would be generally speaking fine > with me, but I am afraid that will not have much time to really > contribute anything beyond that single package. I therefore think I > would not make much sense.
The point is not only that you provide more input to Debian Science but rather that it might come to global changes of some packaging methods which could applied generally (we just had this in the case of handling scientific citations). It could also be that other people might look for reported bugs for your package etc. You should not really trust on this but refusing the option in the first place does not sound senisible. Finally by working inside the Debian Science team gives you good chances that your package is propagated in the Blends web sentinel http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/ Speaking about this could you please name the tasks there where you think your package could be most useful (feel free to name more than one). > Anyway, if there is anything I could do to homogenize the package with > Debian Science packages, please let me know. I am happy to make further > adjustments. ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/<packagename>.git If you or Yaroslav have created this I'd volunteer to do the needed "work" which is also described here: http://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140326213541.gd23...@an3as.eu