On 08/04/2014 05:14 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> >> The fact that the package was uploaded is then indicated in the vcs by >> the debian revision tag which is created by the sponsor. >> >> [1] http://pet.alioth.debian.org/ > > Unfortunately this list is desperately outdated (I know for sure that > PET does not work for Debian Med any more since the last PET rewrite > :-() > >> [2] http://pet.debian.net/pkg-perl/pet.cgi >> >> One can of course do it differently, but this is why I considered >> removing UNRELEASED when one is ready a standard practice. > > I agree that this workflow has some advantages *IF* PET is used and I > would really welcome if we could implement PET for Debian Science as > well (any volunteer??) >
I'm volunteer. Andreas, what needs to be done? -- Jose Luis Rivero <jriv...@osrfoundation.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53dfa4e9.3040...@osrfoundation.org