On 08/04/2014 05:14 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>
>> The fact that the package was uploaded is then indicated in the vcs by
>> the debian revision tag which is created by the sponsor.
>>
>> [1] http://pet.alioth.debian.org/
> 
> Unfortunately this list is desperately outdated (I know for sure that
> PET does not work for Debian Med any more since the last PET rewrite
> :-()
> 
>> [2] http://pet.debian.net/pkg-perl/pet.cgi
>>
>> One can of course do it differently, but this is why I considered
>> removing UNRELEASED when one is ready a standard practice.
> 
> I agree that this workflow has some advantages *IF* PET is used and I
> would really welcome if we could implement PET for Debian Science as
> well (any volunteer??)
> 

I'm volunteer. Andreas, what needs to be done?

-- 
Jose Luis Rivero <jriv...@osrfoundation.org>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53dfa4e9.3040...@osrfoundation.org

Reply via email to