Thanks for the prompt reply. On 08/03/15 21:02, Tobias Hansen wrote: > Hi Jerome, > > when this ticket is done: > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17254 > > Maybe for Sage 6.7 I guess. If we're lucky they may even still put it > into Sage 6.6. > > If you have too much time and feel like setting up a Debian unstable (I > used schroot) you can even build sage 6.5 using Debian packages now with > only 40 or so failing doctests. We can always use help with fixing > these. Instructions on > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Sage
In fact, I wondering whether or not I may consider to package Singular 3 at one point. For now, it is certainly better to finalize the package singular 4: lacking dependencies, documentation, and certainly more. Best wishes, Jerome > > Best, > Tobias > > Am 08.03.2015 um 20:54 schrieb Jerome BENOIT: >> Hello List, >> >> On 08/02/15 14:35, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have just deposited singular 4 at Alioth. >> >> and now it in the NEW queue. >> >> Whatever, I have a question about Sage: >> at what point, so to speak, Sage may use singular 4 ? >> >> >> Best wishes, >> Jerome >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jerome >>> >>> On 01/02/15 21:05, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> On 01/02/15 20:37, Julien Puydt wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I've been a little busy with sage recently : >>>>> >>>>> jpuydt@cauchy:~/sage-exp$ wc -l /tmp/ptestlong.log.* 247159 >>>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.1 91206 /tmp/ptestlong.log.2 21563 >>>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.3 13453 /tmp/ptestlong.log.4 15762 >>>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.5 12012 /tmp/ptestlong.log.6 10320 >>>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.7 411475 total >>>>> >>>>> Let me remind you all of this is done by using as many >>>>> system-installed packages as possible, in order to see which debian >>>>> packages need to be modified and how. Until now, only maxima needs >>>>> some love, and we're lacking packages for : libgap, cddlib, rubiks, >>>>> sagenb, sagetex, singular and jmol. >>>> >>>> singular is on its way (without the user documentation to begin with, >>>> but at this stage it might not be that important): >>>> I have to revisit d/copyright, and then bring to git my ready material. >>>> >>>> Otherwise, I thought that libgap could be worked around. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have attached my current patch ; I'm sorry it is a big contains-all >>>>> patch and not a series, but it's easier to work like this for the >>>>> moment. I'm exploring uncharted territory, not doing clean packaging. >>>>> Yet. >>>>> >>>>> The src/sage/interfaces/gp.py part has been quite painful to obtain, >>>>> but might make Felix cry -- of joy! >>>>> >>>>> I hope that helps, >>>>> >>>>> Snark on #debian-science >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> Jerome >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net http://www.rezozer.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54fcad40.3060...@rezozer.net