Hi Ghislain, On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 06:06:49PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > >I vaguely remember that creating a repository on collab-maint need > >to be > >done by a DD and requires manual intervention. > > The description in [1] does not explicitly mentioned this is > restricted to DD usage. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/CollabMaint
It is not restricted regarding *usage* but a DD has to ask for getting anybody else added. > > >Please give proper why > >you prefer collab-maint which requires extra work with no visible > >profit > >over debian-med/debian-science. > > I thought only packages or deps related to scientific packages were > welcome in > d-science. Is there any doc that supports your thought? ;-) I'm to lazy to find counter examples to what you think but I'd find five packages very quickly if it wouldn't be so late. > Since some packages I work on seemed to fit the > description in [1], I > thought about using collab-maint instead. > > >We have previously packaged non-med / > >non-science software as preconditions for our target packages and > >I see > >no point to derive from this habit for cosmetic reasons. > > The one package I had in mind at the moment was bitstring [2], which > is more of a > general purpose module but may become an install-dep of future > scientific packages. > > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781540 > Bottom line is I should stick to d-science for this one ? Yes. This would simplify things. > Thanks for your very much for your comments, You are welcome Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
