2015-04-28 18:32 GMT+01:00 Ole Streicher <[email protected]>: > Ghislain Vaillant <[email protected]> writes: > > I have switched all binary packages with Architecture: any to > > Architecture: amd64 and it did the trick for my test PPA [1]. > > > > Please let me know whether this is considered acceptable. > > Debian is multi-arch, and so I would not limit the architectures to > amd64 even if this is the main use case. > > There are other architectures which may become useful in the near > future, like arm64. Also, often bugs manifest not on amd64, so it would > be very helpful for bug-hunting. > > Why don't you just keep the "any" and let the 32-bit architecture FTBS? > The advantage would be that sometimes there is a good soul that fixes > one or the other thingie to let it compile. Porters sometimes do a > really good job there. > > Best > > Ole > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [email protected] > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > > You are absolutely correct Ole. Sometimes I forget that we are not the only ones working on the packages and porters could actually help on this too.
I will reverse to Architecture: any once I get the source package to a releasable state. For now I am using the Ubuntu PPA as my test repository to check I get everything right. Thank you very much for you advice. Ghis
