Hi,

Le 07/09/2015 13:36, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
since this is just a renamed (and continued) polybori, I think we should
just rename the polybori package and continue packaging there,
keeping git history and changelog. The version numbers are also
continued from the polybori ones.

That's an option -- is it easy to get a package renamed?

I think they also moved to autotools instead of scons, so there will be some repackaging to do anyway.

I'm busy with flint, flint-arb and a few other packages now, so I don't think I'll be of much help on the matter for a good while.

Cheers,

Snark on #debian-science

Reply via email to