On 27/03/16 17:10, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 04:34:36PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: >>> I have uploaded r-cran-r6. The other two packages are lacking a >>> pristine-tar branch that should be provided according to Debian Science >>> policy to enable others easily obtaining the upstream tarball. Even if >>> it is admittedly very easy to get it I see no reason to derive from a >>> workflow that has been established. So please import the original >>> tarball using >> >> Sorry, my bad - my local repos (and the copies in collab-maint) did >> include pristine-tar, but I'd failed to push anything except `master` to >> debian-science*. The missing branches should now be there for all three >> repositories. >> >> (* I should have just copied the server-side git directory, but for some >> reason this didn't occur to me) > > This would have been the more simple solution probably. I uploaded > r-cran-uuid, but for r-cran-pbdzmq the tarball is really missing even > if the branch is there: >
Apparently I made a mess of things and uploaded the pristine tar branch from the wrong repository - I'll work out how to get it cleaned up (probably by deleting and going back to copying as I should have) and let you know when it's done; apologies for now. Gordon > gbp:info: Orig tarball 'r-cran-pbdzmq_0.2.1+dfsg2.orig.tar.gz' not found at > '../tarballs/' > gbp:error: Pristine-tar couldn't checkout > "r-cran-pbdzmq_0.2.1+dfsg2.orig.tar.gz": fatal: Path > 'r-cran-pbdzmq_0.2.1+dfsg2.orig.tar.gz.delta' does not exist in > 'refs/heads/pristine-tar' > pristine-tar: git show > refs/heads/pristine-tar:r-cran-pbdzmq_0.2.1+dfsg2.orig.tar.gz.delta failed > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > PS: Please contact me via debian-science list to keep other developers > in the row, thanks. >