Thanks for the hint! Did just that. Cheers, Nico
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:11 PM Graham Inggs <gin...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Nico > > You can copy what I did for deal.ii here [1]. > The updated version of debhelper is needed so that it understands ddebs. > The version after 'dh_strip --ddeb-migration' is the new version > number (the one you are uploading) suffixed with a '~'. > > Regards > Graham > > > [1] > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/deal.ii.git/commit/?id=a3dd3b46448be9cb2107b1eb4fa0c21adee95fb7 > > > On 23/05/2016 14:51, Nico Schlömer wrote: > >> W: libsuperlu5-dbg: empty-binary-package > >> Looks like debug symbols automatically went into libsuperlu5-dbgsym, > >> so libsuperlu5-dbg is redundant (i.e. rename in debian/control. Or > >> specify -dbg as the debug package in debian/rules, e.g. with dh_strip). > > > > If it's build automatically, can't we just get rid of the -dbg entry in > > debian/control altogether? > > > > Cheers, > > Nico > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 1:54 PM Nico Schlömer <nico.schloe...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >>> That's dodgy how upstream handled the non-free in MATLAB/time.m. All > >> they did was delete Mathwork's copyright statement. It's on their head. > >> > >> Indeed. All files that are listed as exceptions from the BSD license > >> (except mc64ad.*) in debian/copyright now have a BSD copyright header as > >> well, btw. It very much looks like they are dual-licensed now. Shall we > >> take this for granted? I guess we could remove some complication from > >> debian/copyright with this. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Nico > >> > >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 1:19 PM Drew Parsons <dpars...@debian.org> > wrote: > >> > >>> Should be good to go. > >>> > >>> That's dodgy how upstream handled the non-free in MATLAB/time.m. All > >>> they did was delete Mathwork's copyright statement. It's on their head. > >>> > >>> Drew > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 10:15 +0000, Nico Schlömer wrote: > >>>> Drew, > >>>> > >>>> 5.2.1 came out yesterday with some of my PRs applied. Can you import > >>>> it please? I'd then go through the remaining issues. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Nico > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 9:43 PM Drew Parsons <dpars...@debian.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 11:00 +0000, Nico Schlömer wrote: > >>>>>>> More important is that some dfsg files are still in the git > >>>>> tree. > >>>>>>> MATLAB/{spypart.m,time.m} and DOC/*ug.pdf. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Aha yes. (Is the user guide really nonfree?) > >>>>> > >>>>> The argument is that the pdf is the useful bit, like a binary > >>>>> program. > >>>>> Just as we need the source for binary files, for the same reason > >>>>> we > >>>>> want the source (the latex files) for the pdf files. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Unfortunately, I have no experience with automatically creating > >>>>> dfsg > >>>>>> tarballs, and there's a fair chance I'll do it incorrectly. I'd > >>>>>> appreciate if someone could take over from here. > >>>>> > >>>>> I've tidied up the dfsg handling, listing the reject files in > >>>>> debian/copyright. > >>>>> > >>>>> The package builds fine (and petsc3.7 seems happy with it). > >>>>> > >>>>> The last step is to check lintian, > >>>>> lintian -i superlu_5.2.0+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes > >>>>> > >>>>> There's a handful of warnings, have a go at fixing them: > >>>>> > >>>>> W: superlu source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique > >>>>> (paragraph at line 109) > >>>>> There are 2 licence short-names "permissive". Give one a distinct > >>>>> short name from the other. permissive-colamd or something. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> W: superlu source: ancient-standards-version 3.9.5 (current is > >>>>> 3.9.8) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> W: libsuperlu5-dbg: empty-binary-package > >>>>> Looks like debug symbols automatically went into libsuperlu5- > >>>>> dbgsym, > >>>>> so libsuperlu5-dbg is redundant (i.e. rename in debian/control. > >>>>> Or > >>>>> specify -dbg as the debug package in debian/rules, e.g. with > >>>>> dh_strip). > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for your packaging efforts. > >>>>> Drew > >>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Nico > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM Drew Parsons <dpars...@debian.or > >>>>> g> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 09:49 +0000, Nico Schlömer wrote: > >>>>>>>> I've pushed some more changes to [1] (including a patch) and > >>>>> it's > >>>>>>> now > >>>>>>>> compiling and installing alright. I guess a review would be > >>>>> in > >>>>>>> order. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>> Nico > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [1] alioth:/git/debian-science/packages/superlu.git > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > > > >
