On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 07:14:22PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote: > Packages ucto and frog have been updated > accordingly to depend on it (no new upstream). The three packages are ready > for upload now.
starting with frog: * git repo is missing the tag for the last upload * please revert eec388092aae834ed4dd6643b524861faca64356 * and also 941f7477add917bc757d4123cba4336fe94b141e (unless it really does need a newer ucto dependency, does it really?! the generated binary dependency is not versioned (and how could it without proper symbol file...), so I very much doubt forcing a build order between ucto and frog means really something at the end (if it has issues building against a ucto built against a different version of libfolia than the one frog is currently building against, then it should fail the build; but this is actually a rarer issue that you might think). * the "[ Name Surname ]" thing in the changelog is only needed if different people made changes for that single upload; if you're alone you can remove it * you have a bunch of trailing newlines in changelog for ucto: well, not much to do considering I reviewed the last upload :P Just, don't bump the build-dep. If you have no changes to do in this package, what you want is a No-change upload to rebuild against libfolia5 like we do in Ubuntu; or ask the release team to schedule a binNMU (which effectively achieves the very same, just bothering more people for nothing in this case, if you ask me..). I'm also waiting for the auto-transitioner to notice the libfolia upload and create a transition tracker to have more assurance those are the only 2 rdeps. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature