I nearly missed ga, which had an undeclared dependency on blacs. I've made the nmu for scalapack2, it now finds pdsyevr.
I notice it searches for ELPA, which could be made available to it (I didn't add that change to the nmu). Drew On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 12:01 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > Hi Debichem team, > > I've uploaded nmus to remove the libblacs-mpi-dev dependency in > elpa > espresso > cp2k (it had an undeclared dependency on blacs, satisfied > indirectly > by libscalapack-mpi-dev) > > (I also updated freefem++) > > I made a typo in the changelog for elpa 2016.05.001-4.1, I meant > "BLACS is now included" not "BLACS is not included". Please correct > it > when you fold the nmu into your elpa repo. > > I've also filed bug reports for nwchem. > > That should be all the BLACS clients, unless there are any other > undeclared dependencies. SCALAPACK clients should rebuild against > scalapack2 without drama (at most they might need a path updated for > multiarch libs). > > Cheers, > Drew > > > On Sun, 2017-09-10 at 02:14 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > > The scalapack 2 transition is now live, uploaded to unstable. > > > > Drew > > > > > > On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 11:05 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > > > Hi Drew > > > > > > On 19/07/2017 17:06, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > scalapack 2.0 is now available in experimental. It's quite a > > > > big > > > > transition (absorbing blacs, most notably) so we'll want to > > > > test > > > > dependent packages before dropping it into unstable. We need > > > > to > > > > check > > > > the transition from blacs to scalapack is smooth. > > > > > > > > Can you tell us (or commit to the scalapack git directly) if we > > > > need > > > > any tweaks to keep elpa, c2pk and espresso happy? > > > > > > > > scalapack now builds with cmake and we may want to change the > > > > way > > > > we > > > > install its cmake scripts. pkg-config also. We've built both > > > > openmpi > > > > and mpich versions. > > > > > > Thanks for your work on this! > > > > > > I plan to enable scalapack support in gpaw soon (it requires >= > > > 2.0.1) > > > and will let you know if any tweaks are required. > > > > > > Regards > > > Graham > >
