Hi Philip, On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:59:49AM +0100, Philip Rinn wrote: > On 15.01.2018 at 13:32, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Since you intended to package more of this I've just granted you master > > privileges. > > thanks!
You are welcome. > > I'll care for quick sponsoring. > > I tried to find a sponsor for node-pinkyswear on the javascript list but > didn't > succeed ... so to get things going it might be good to just keep it in the > Debian > Science team for now. What do you think? That's fine and not unusual. > The packaging is here (I'd like to move it to .../science-team/... before > uploading) > > https://salsa.debian.org/rinni-guest/node-pinkyswear Could you please move to science-team first to make me evaluate the final status of the package? > And here it the packaging of node-shiny-server-client which should be in > science-team anyway > > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/node-shiny-server-client I've requested a release tag on Github[1]. This would help to create a sensible watch file. Moreover some cosmetic remark: I'm very used to the cme file layout of debian/control. You get it when using cme fix dpkg-control ... at least under normal conditions. Cme is not yet adapted to salsa so it does not yet work with the current control file. I hacked around this and commited the result. I do not insist in this form but in teams with lots of contributors its nice to have some common layout to let the packages look somehow "familiar" for sponsors. If you have strong esthetic reasons to insist on your old formatting feel free to revert my last commit. Both things are no reason to stop me from sponsoring. So if you confirm that my last commit is fine for you I'll upload as it is now - otherwise I'll upload your latest commit. > Could you please review the packages and upload them if everything is fine? Thanks for your work on this Andreas. [1] https://github.com/rstudio/shiny-server-client/issues/12 -- http://fam-tille.de
