> Good question; I'm surprised -v doesn't say. Does adding --debug help? It just gives a directory: doc/ but it contains several doc files and I thought I had removed the culprit (the doxygen doc of toulbar2).
The --debug variant does help however. N: Running check: cruft on source:toulbar2/1.0.0+dfsg2-1 ... P: toulbar2 source: source-contains-prebuilt-doxygen-documentation doc/ N: N: The source tarball contains prebuilt doxygen documentation. This is N: usually left by mistake when generating the tarball without first N: cleaning the source directory. You may want to report this as an N: upstream bug, if there is no sign that this was intended. N: N: It is preferable to rebuild documentation directly from source. N: N: Severity: pedantic, Certainty: possible N: N: Check: cruft, Type: source N: N: Check script cruft for source:toulbar2/1.0.0+dfsg2-1 done (0.344s) So, I found the /usr/share/lintian/checks/cruft.pm that does the job and it looks for "doxygen.png" and "doxygen.sty" which I did not remove. I just removed the doc itself. I will exclude more in debian/copyrightand prepare a +dfsg3 version. > Meanwhile, please do double-check your doc-base handling; per > dh_installdocs(1), best practice is to give the files standardized names > and not attempt to list them in .install files. Ok. I just followed the debian wiki indicationsfor doc-base. I will dive in dh_installdocs(1) :-) Thomas