reopen 1016732
stop

Hi Yadd,

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 07:45:35PM +0000, Krüger, Sebastian wrote:
> I'm not a Shiny user either (so far), however the plan is for our institute 
> to provide Shiny applications for certain users. (I will probably write some 
> of these applications at some point, and I also administrate the web 
> server...).
> 
> My test system: I have a current Debian sid with R, cleaned from nodejs 
> (apt...) and thus without shiny-server.
> 
> Now I install the shiny-server (apt install shiny-server).
> 
> In the packages r-cran-shiny and shiny-server are sample applications. I 
> copied the examples from the r-cran-shiny package (e.g. 
> /usr/lib/R/site-library/shiny/examples/01_hello) to /srv/shiny-server and 
> could (after restarting shiny-server (systemctl restart shiny-server)) access 
> the application via firefox: http://localhost:3838/01_hello/ .
> 
> These applications consist of a UI part (user interface) and a result part. 
> In the UI part, the web user can set (e.g.) parameters for the display in the 
> result part.
> 
> The problem: After installation, only the UI part is visible via the web 
> browser.
> The result part is probably not visible because it does not receive any data 
> from the UI part.
> 
> With the help of a deb package for the Shiny sever from rstudio and the 
> Debian package, I had at some point identified the sockjs installation as the 
> problem...
> 
> To get the Shiny application running (in the current scenario), I got the 
> latest version of sockjs from github, "comped" it with npm () and then 
> replaced the javascript files under "/usr/share/nodejs/sockjs/lib/" (from the 
> Debian installation) with the files from the sockjs (github) package tree 
> ".../node_modules/sockjs/lib/".
> 
> After restarting the Shiny server, you can now also see the result part in 
> the web browser and the Shiny application works. 
> 
> I am not a javascript/coffeescript friend or expert. The only thing I could 
> see is that both my sockjs scripts and the Debian ones are based on the same 
> github version (https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-node/releases/tag/v0.3.24), 
> but the Debian version was generated with coffescript 2.7.0 and "my" version 
> was generated with coffescript 1.12.7.

Looks like the coffeescript thingy in #1016732 is still unfixed and I've 
re-opened the BR. Could you please
consider taking another look?

-- 
Best,
Nilesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to