Hi Maarten, Just uploaded libfolia_2.21-1_amd64.changes . Please fix this:
Now running lintian libfolia_2.21-1_amd64.changes ... W: libfolia source: superfluous-file-pattern m4/ax_pthread.m4 [debian/copyright:29] W: libfolia source: superfluous-file-pattern m4/pkg.m4 [debian/copyright:25] Finished running lintian. before the next upload. Thanks for your work! Bye, Joost PS: I believe all uploads of other packages will get properly built now. I am not quite sure if a source-only upload of libfolia and ticcutils is needed once these 2 get through NEW; we'll find out in due time... On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 08:11:50PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > For the record: I'm in touch with upstream about an issue with libfolia: > > пет 24 19:56 < joostvb> gbp:error: Cannot find pristine tar commit for archive > 'libfolia_2.21.orig.tar.gz' > [20:09] [joostvb(+i)] [34:MeukNet/#lst(+nt)] > > Bye, > > Joost > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 07:10:43PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > Hi Maarten, > > > > just did: > > > > joostvb@agni:~/git/opaque-store% dupload --to anonymous-ftp-master > > ../build-area/ticcutils_0.36-1_source.changes > > > > no time for libfolia now. > > > > HTH! > > > > Bye, > > > > Joost > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 03:57:17PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote: > > > Hi Andreas et al, > > > > > > Here's another update on this: it got pointed out to me that I had > > > actual upload rights for my packages and might not need a sponsor after > > > all (I'm in https://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt). So I prepared all the > > > packages again and ran dupload on them. > > > > > > That seemed to go well, except I now got two rejections: > > > > > > ticcutils_0.36-1_source.changes REJECTED > > > ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed > > > binary:libticcutils10 is NEW. > > > > > > libfolia_2.21-1_source.changes REJECTED > > > ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed > > > binary:folialint is NEW. > > > binary:libfolia22 is NEW. > > > > > > All other packages got ACCEPTED (however, they rely on the rejected ones > > > so things won't work). > > > > > > The package counts as new because of the SO-bump we did, but it seems I > > > don't have the permissions to upload that? I don't really know how to > > > proceed > > > now anymore... > > > > > > >> Since these packages are depending from the first one I did not > > > >> continued. If you want to do your final sponsor a favour please > > > >> set the target distribution of those packages to "UNRELEASED" again > > > > > > > Done, I reverted them to UNRELEASED and updated them (there was no > > > > routine-update in debian testing though, so I did it manually) > > > > > > I had reverted the reversion again (can you still follow? they're back > > > to 'unstable' because I released them now). All 'debian/*' git tags are > > > also set and pushed now. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Maarten van Gompel > > > Digital Infrastructure, Humanities Cluster, > > > Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (KNAW) > > > > > > web: https://proycon.anaproy.nl > > > gpg: 0x39FE11201A31555C > > > > >
