Hi Dominique, thanks for the work and great news!
I think we can proceed with the transition. Could you please file a corresponding bug? Feel also free to add yourself as an uploader in d/control, if you want. Best regards Anton Am Do., 2. Okt. 2025 um 04:55 Uhr schrieb Dominique Belhachemi <[email protected]>: > > Hi Anton, > > The current VTK version in experimental (vtk9 9.5.2+dfsg2-1~exp4) looks good > to me. > It was built with Qt6 GUISupport, but without ParaView support due to memory > exhaustion on some build archs. > > Most Level 2 reverse dependencies build fine now. > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-vtk9.html > asl # OK > gdcm # TBD, FTBFS in sid > lammps # OK > liggghts # OK > mia # TBD, FTBFS in sid > odin # OK Simple patch needed > open3d # OK > opencascade # OK Simple patch needed > pcl # OK Simple patch needed > therion # OK > yade # OK > > I did not test Level 3 and 4 reverse dependencies that depend on gdcm. > > Given this status, can we request a transition slot and proceed with the > upload to unstable? > > Best > -Dominique >
