Dear all, First of all thank you for the whole team for keeping Debian as secure as it is the people on the team do to keep Debian free from controversy (at least from the security viewpoint) .
Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the mailing list, sorry. I just came upon sandsifter today. While I have done an RFP on it , could people have a look at it. It's being tracked as #906246 , thank you in advance. https://github.com/xoreaxeaxeax/sandsifter Also see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrksBdWcZgQ which is a blackhat presentation given by the Developer. Could you all examine it and see if it's worth including in Debian, the only pre-requisite it asks for is already in Debian i.e. capstone. I dunno if it would be a good tool or not as I do not have the expertise to know whether the package 'phones home' or not, how dangerous or not dangerous the analysis would be. The only requirements are libcapstone3 and libcapstone-dev before compiling the python script (via make). The other odd thing seems to that the developer has mentioned to use 32-bit variation of the libcapstone3 and libcapstone-dev which at least IMHO would make it more resource intensive as it means it would be limited to only using 4 GiB of memory when it could use the whole 8-128 GiB memory depending upon the workstation properties but what do I know of these things. Looking forward to know. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8