-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi Team,
I received a request to bring tomb 2.6 to buster (see forwarded mail below). I believe backports is the way to go. Do you agree? @Dmitry: I'm not sure why you consider tomb 2.6 a security update. Anyway, to emphasize your request I suggest you open up a whishlist bug against tomb. Sven - -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Von: Dmitry Elmanov <delma...@gmail.com> An: Sven Geuer <debma...@g-e-u-e-r.de> Betreff: Re: Tomb package 2.5 > 2.6 Datum: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 14:11:22 +0300 > Dear Sven > > Tomb 2.6 safely settled in the Testing. Thank you. > In my opinion, there are all signs that version 2.6 > is a "security update", and therefore may come to > a stable branch. Is it possible? Or backports...? > > Best regards, > Dmitry Elmanov > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEPfXoqkP8n9/QhvGVrfUO2vit1YUFAl2WRakACgkQrfUO2vit 1YWS7g/9HoeQkkz14koe0iBfC6pqDFxgkLyFcdB4GOUF6eu3A6kHdSsfYDj4g33F kUwANU2aZ3ep3plkb6bS5SmpDRt3g1Mwvd+za0rlQNyEu2lnbqOUZKEqpcRg4xl7 BLkbevYeDCc36WOg2GgxtaQ0+PBeVTl0k19jeQgP0CIHcwKDGt3wkjS89NAsanqn IICiP3sLN3yFWtpPiK6KkUrQ0P2hCU7xDSdutKxNw0uRLzGL7iemX8vmD+SzjCDe QtZaY2HW3lrMPcPjWgbmj90y4wsufuEWduKGJSl0XWXDX/vhGQLBFOJMCb2C19lV kASTBzcldhxLakqeOkW4GomS2GajO1TQ//mY8P2/KIYjlIxEmt8XUxWjm3CU/F+O khPrC8ZNZ6eW+kf+Xw7suKKnTirSI5MvWKtnJRklh/ufVXlEY5ALAz/enesKQ6jx bMz4FwMM1amvc5qlsKOlFHMLUuDP2KxmHvcum5aZnbs0M5VLETviRKcRSrOWh9Yh YkB/scyHS0CYHDgOr1umpEeV7XcQSmlOpx6/yb3m4UrVnSMeCHCZI5tjSb43NFo2 yb3gjduPCsXJ0/Snpyw7MXeKemtFV4RJXp20StKokAB+bjyDVkhILDLTaay/Iw5t FvZPz0+s4NY8f547dRpofbjVdPbnulFlNP8Fgu2FN+oZr4b2NXM= =a+4B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
