>> The tracker page [1] for CVE-2008-3699 says "Debian/stable not known >> to be vulnerable", yet in the next section it says that "etch 1.4.4-4 >> vulnerable". These two statements contradict one another, and lead one >> clueless as to whether the issue has been fixed or not in stable. The >> tracker should be updated with correct information. > > In this case the issue is marked as a "non-issue", the rationale is at the > bottom of the page. That makes the top part say that we're not affected. > The vulnerability indications below are not that meaningful for > non-issues. > > We could see if we can improve the presentation of items marked as a > non-issue.
The CVE-2008-3230 page seems to have the same problem. What would need to be done to fix this? I may have some time to look at the code and make it work better -- if someone can tell me where to start. Is the code that generates these pages contained in the secure-testing package? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
