On Thu, February 10, 2011 03:40, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:12:21 +0100 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > >> On Wed, February 9, 2011 19:50, Francesco Poli wrote: >> > On the other hand, the security tracker seems to still think that >> lenny >> > is stable [1] and squeeze is testing [2], while I have been unable to >> > find any traces of wheezy... >> > >> > Is there something that should be done manually, in order to let the >> > tracker realize that squeeze is out? >> > Is there any event that should happen before this can be done? >> >> I've changed the code right after squeeze's release. I've also restarted >> the tracker service. Apparently this is not enough - Florian, can you >> help? > > The Makefile also needs to change since that is used to download the > release files that are parsed for package version info.
Thanks, so that's what I've overlooked. I changed it now but (famous last words) I need to leave soon so I hope it didn't break too much. On the other hand, the tracker didn't work for wheezy now anyway. I skipped the volatile part as that has completely changed for squeeze so if someone wants to put the correct urls in there be my guest. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-tracker-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/071cd33e88baa4c34f9313f0f6a31300.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl
