On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:02:10PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: [snip] > I'd still argue that exit(_macro_) is better style than return from > main(), but I'm hard pressed to find a technical argument. > There's subtle difference between returning from main and calling exit. Excelent explanation is in C-FAQ 11.16 http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q11.16.html. -- dg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Security in a shell that starts ssh Miquel Mart?n L?pez
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Aaron Dewell
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Peņa
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Tim van Erven
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Steve Greenland
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Daniel Ginsburg
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Tim van Erven
- Re: Security in a shell that start... Steven Huang
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Steve Greenland
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Daniel Ginsburg
- Re: Security in a shell that start... Miquel Mart?n L?pez
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Steve Greenland
- Re: Security in a shell that start... Daniel Ginsburg
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Tim van Erven
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Daniel Ginsburg
- Re: Security in a shell that start... Tim van Erven
- Re: Security in a shell that start... Peter Cordes
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... David Ehle
- Re: Security in a shell that starts ss... Miquel Mart?n L?pez
- Re: Security in a shell that start... Peter Cordes