On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 02:44:48AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > compiling without module support would be mostly the same as just > > lcap CAP_SYS_MODULE Fwiw, I have heard (though not tested myself) that even if you compile your kernel _without_ loadable module support, you will still be able to insert modules into the running kernel. Again I have not tried this myself, but something to test for before relying on a certain behavior. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- A question about Knark and modules Sjarn Valkhoff
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Ethan Benson
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Juha Jäykkä
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Ethan Benson
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Sjarn Valkhoff
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Ethan Benson
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Christian Jaeger
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Jim Breton
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Ethan Benson
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Ethan Benson
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Peter Cordes
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Ethan Benson
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Philipp Schulte
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Peter Cordes
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Ethan Benson
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Ethan Benson
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Philipp Schulte
- Re: A question about Knark and modules Ethan Benson