On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 07:13:00PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 07:52:02PM -0700, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > >
> > Still not the point. I'm talking about services being enabled, either
>
> i don't think you know what your point is. i pointed out that openbsd
> starts portmap by default, along with identd and you reply with `but
> they are not exploitable' which is rubbish of course.
Oh, I guess anyone can say something like "Four years without a remote
hole in the default install!" on the internet, where anyone is free to
prove them wrong, and get away with it? Assuming it is "rubbish", as
you say.
If anyone who reads the posts I made looks at them with an objective
outlook, they will see that my message is clearly stated.
Starting services by default is a bad idea.
>
> go annoy someone else. i can change nothing in debian, i am not a
> debian developer, go annoy one of them.
>
I have never CCed any message to you. I only sent them to the list.
I don't think you own the list, and I do think developers read the list.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
