Incoming from Alvin Oga: > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, s. keeling wrote: > > > > why is your spam filter allowing 3 basic "spam signs" thru ?? > > > - email to "undisclosed-recipients" should be bounced > > > > > > - email from non-existent hosts should be bounced > > > host-69-145-228-124.client.bresnan.net > > > > > > - email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be bounced since > > > its not coming from bresnan.net > > > > If I can't, what does my ISP have to do to implement this? > > ISP will probably NOT provide spam filtering, becuase of legal issues
My ISP does provide spam filtering; spamassassin marks crap on the mailhost and procmail moves it to my spamfile. I can review it there via webmail and blow it away without downloading it. However, I _would_ like to STOP it from being delivered at all, as defined by simple rules like those above. As far as I can tell, this must be done in the SMTP negotiation phase. What's it going to cost my ISP to implement this? Is it feasible for an ISP to implement this? -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling - - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
