On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:56:18PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 09:27:52AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Michael Stone wrote:
> dealing with packages which will not be maintainable over the course of
> a stable release. Apache doesn't meet that criterion because its
Wasn't there a big thread about exactly this issue, centered around amavis,
clamav and snort a while ago?
Yes, the answer is volatile.debian.net(.org) as you prefer.
No, that's the answer to a different question. (What to do with software
that's inherently dependent on volatile information, like virus or ids
signatures.)
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
