On Tuesday 13 February 2001 15:02, marcoghidinelli wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 02:52:57PM -0600, Bud Rogers wrote:
> > I have the same problem with Martin Schulze's sigs. I've retrieved > > the debian keyring from the website and from my CD, I've manually > > retrieved his key from public keyservers and from the debian > > website All the fingerprints match. I've signed his key on my > > keyring. I even tried giving it full trust. His sigs are still > > flagged as bad here. > > sure?? all the debian-security-announce was correctly signed.. Yes. Wichert's signature yesterday on dsa-030-1 appeared bad here also. At least my mailer marked it as bad. I saved the email and tried to verify it manually. Here's what I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --verify dsa-030-1 gpg: Signature made Mon Feb 12 11:11:53 2001 CST using RSA key ID ED9547ED gpg: BAD signature from "Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ I'm satisfied Wichert's signature is not bad, nor is Martin's. I just haven't figured out how to make them good at my end. Sorry, I don't mean to be a pest. I would like to get this right. -- Bud Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.sirinet.net/~budr/zamm.html All things in moderation. And not too much moderation either.