Right, and I think its strange that the parent process felt the need to kill the child process. It might be justified if the child seg'd or died, but i thought xinetd handled this with more grace than say inetd... just curious, thats all.
g. -----Original Message----- From: Christian Hammers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:34 AM To: Gary MacDougall Cc: Sven Hoexter; debian-security@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:31:38AM -0500, Gary MacDougall wrote: > I find it interesting that the seg fault happened, then xinetd reported it > failed. xinetd was proftpd's daddy: ServerType inetd bye, -christian- -- Christian Hammers WESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren Tel 0241/701333-0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet & Security for Professionals Fax 0241/911879 WESTEND ist CISCO Systems Partner - Premium Certified -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.310 / Virus Database: 171 - Release Date: 12/19/2001 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.310 / Virus Database: 171 - Release Date: 12/19/2001