On Monday, 2002-01-14 at 15:12:48 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:15:16PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > Previously Adam Warner wrote: > > > Someone with better knowledge of all the facts might want to comment on > > > the claim that "Debian is always the last to fix security holes" and the > > > tag team follow up "I've been fighting for months now to try to convince > > > them to release an advisory or fix for ftpd..."
> > Someone should point them to Javier's analysis of security response > > times.. > Thanks' I was about to say so... BTW pointer is: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2001/debian-security-200112/msg00257.html > I'm going to add this to the info available in the "Debian > Security Manual" seems to be a FAQ.... I hope you provide a cleaned-up version. .../msg00257.html is full of binary crap. And the link .../bin00000.bin could be stored as the PNG file it is supposed to be. The way it is now, I get a MIME-type of application/octet-stream, which Mozilla won't display. Maybe you can put the text, the spreadsheet, and the graph on a website? Archive maintainers, what happens to attachments like those in the mentioned mail? I don't keep debian-security mails around, so I can't see what MIME-type the attachments had. The binary crap must be the spreadsheet which has been inlined. Lupe Christoph -- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://free.prohosting.com/~lupe | | I have challenged the entire ISO-9000 quality assurance team to a | | Bat-Leth contest on the holodeck. They will not concern us again. | | http://public.logica.com/~stepneys/joke/klingon.htm |