-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "DSC" == DSC Siltec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DSC> Actually, the beauty of the Parker Souchacki method is that it DSC> would allow the simultaneous solution of a system of equations that DSC> has one functional solution. Which means that you only need one DSC> set of equations, and it solves for all values at once, DSC> Which means you might have only about 40 equations to solve, and DSC> when you add the RSA algorithm, perhaps another 10-20. The I think that Michael's point was that you'd need P * 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 equations; not 10-20. BTW, why are you discussing this on debian-security, and not with some real mathematicians? (Not that there aren't any real mathematicians on this list, but d-s is populated mostly with admins.) Someone like Schneier would be in a much better position than pretty much anyone on this list to tell you whether or not you're right. Even a professor from a local University would probably know better. DSC> However, the double-layered encryption, which always takes a DSC> randomly generated number as its "raw data", does sound secure, DSC> because the RNGs are going to be practically unbreakable (we hope DSC> -- and that can be improved with white-noise CDs recorded from your DSC> local waterfall.). ??? According to your proposal, an attacker only needs the public key, the plaintext, and the ciphertext, all of which are easy to obtain. The public key is know due to it being public. He can generate his own plaintext, and generate a ciphertext "by hand," so the fact that every PGP implementation uses a double layer encryption doesn't help. Whether or not the digital signature on this message has been forged is up to you to guess. ;-) - -- Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.geocities.com/hubertchan/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/71FDA37F Fingerprint: 6CC5 822D 2E55 494C 81DD 6F2C 6518 54DF 71FD A37F Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8yfEjZRhU33H9o38RAvUYAKCSTa1fPORg7ebHrwU6+m38RpzCYQCgw2Mb aQOPRN6JLnYzenpnpMlvBOI= =aHSP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]