Previously Raymond Wood wrote:
>but I would really like to see either:
>   a) woody receiving security patches as soon as sid and potato;
>     or
>   b) no woody.

>From a security viewpoint b) is the only option, and we have always said
so. 

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /[EMAIL PROTECTED]         This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to