This one time, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
> diagnoseproblems themselves? If they can't they should be running stable
> or at least testing?

I think there's nothing wrong with helping someone out, no matter
which group they're running. Why should it matter? Isn't this mailing
list called debian-security? Not debian-security-stable.

> Unstable is not just a name...

Neither is testing nor stable :)

-Anne
-- 
              .-"".__."``".   Anne Carasik, System Administrator
 .-.--. _...' (/)   (/)   ``'   gator at cacr dot caltech dot edu 
(O/ O) \-'      ` -="""=.    ',  Center for Advanced Computing Research    
~`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attachment: pgpNQKHtRQo5U.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to