On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:11:41AM -0600, Nathan E Norman remarked: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:48:23AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote: > > This makes sense to me, so I can accept the Spam I receive > > through the debian lists. One thing I'm still unclear about > > though is the recent post from someone who requested that people > > *not* report Spam received through the debian lists to Razor. I > > have set up a Mutt hotkey to report Spam to Razor, and I confess > > I don't really understand why any and all Spam should not be > > reported. > > > > Can anyone enlighten me, or is there a FAQ I should be reading > > instead?
> Some people[1] report non-spam as spam to razor. For example, several > security announcements from Debian have found their way into the razor > database. This is obviously stupid. > > [1] At least, we think they are people, but the level of intelligence > demonstrated leaves room for doubt. > > -- > Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, so the problem is not with reporting genuine Spam to Razor; rather the problem is with incorrectly reporting legitimate email as Spam to Razor? Cheers, Raymond
pgp7U59TIvroa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
