On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:35:01AM +0000, Dale Amon wrote:
> > win2000, probably the "server" variant...
> > ... but thats a different problem ...
>
> I doubt it. FreeSWAN uses Linux kernel patches and
> kernel crypto.
I not meant to say problem with freeswan, but problem with windows IPSec
solutions. at least that is what I experienced.
> That said, FreeSWAN is about as ipsec compliant as anything.
yes.
> However beware: it's difficult to run FreeSWAN through NAT.
thats true. but its doable.
Lars
