Hello Rich, Am 10:42 2003-04-14 -0500 hat Rich Puhek geschrieben:
>Well, no. If you look carefully, you have managed to leak that address >to the list before. On March 17, 2003, for instance (Message-Id: ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) you posted a >reply to a question. Although you set your From address to be the >"linux4michelle" address, you also ended up with the following line: > >X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unverified) Because I have no internet access at home, I can not use mutt to send the messages... need to use a Windows-Client and the I transfer it on Floppyst to the Internet-Cafee and send it with a windows program... So I can not rewrite anything... >So, your MUA or MTA has leaked that address, without anyone needing to >do a lookup on the Debian servers. In some days I will get my new Mobil-Telephone, which I will connect to my router at home... If it works, I can use mutt in the futur. - uff ! (But only for Sending, because downloading of 1 MByte of Debian-Lists each day ist to expensive) >That is a nice approach to handling the spam problem, but as you can >see, one must be very careful to prevent leaking the subscribed to address. have a nice Evening Michelle -- Registered Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.