Greetings, Am Montag, 1. August 2005 05:47 schrieb Matt Zimmerman: > On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 02:03:28PM +0200, Jan Luehr wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 31. Juli 2005 09:49 schrieb Bernd Eckenfels: > > > No but I think most of the desktop packages suffer from the slow > > > release cycle. > > > > Debian is not primarily intended for being used as a desktop system. If > > you are up to desktop centric usage, you should probably run Ubuntu > > instead. > > Debian isn't _primarily_ intended for any such specific purpose, but that > doesn't mean that it isn't suitable. > > Regardless of whether Ubuntu provides a more suitable option for a given > user, I don't think that it's appropriate to make this sort of statement > about Debian when there isn't a consensus within the project to support it.
Have I said so? I've tried to point out, that debian is "an universal operating system" - as proclaimed on the homepage. So at least here is a common consensus for the purpose of debian. If I recommend to use another operating system for a more special purpose, what's wrong here? Keep smiling yanosz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]