Noah Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:57:31PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> > IMHO, sloopy security support (by uploading new upstream versions) is >> > better than no security support. >> >> Are you prepared to make sure all the packages that depend on mozilla >> will have packages ready to enter at once? > > Are you prepared to kick all packages that depend on mozilla out of > Debian completely?
How about actually maintaining them? > That's the choice we've got. Moving them to > backports.org or volatile, which are not carried by the mirror network, > not included in the default apt sources.list, and not getting DSA > announcements, IMHO, counts as "kicking them out of Debian". Oh, I see. I think the whole point of volatile is that it is *part* of Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
