also sprach Timo Veith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.26.1726 +0200]: > >either case can be solved by: security1.debian.org in LA > >and security2.debian.org in NYC and security3.debian.org in berlin :-) > > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree > Reading extended state information > Initializing package states... Done > Err http://security3.debian.org sarge/updates/main Packages > Could not resolve 'security3.debian.org'
I think Alvin was alluding to how it *should* be solved. As in: we should have more than one security server, globally spaced. Heck, we *should* have a responsive and communicative security team. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "the good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from." -- andrew s. tanenbaum
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
