James Strandboge wrote: > In reviewing the changelog and source for gtk+2.0, CVE-2005-3186 and > CVE-2005-2975 are explicitly mentioned (and have patches in > debian/patches). However, CVE-2005-2976 is not mentioned in the > changelog and does not have a separate patch in debian/patches, though > it is mentioned in the DSA. Is this an oversight in the changelog or > was the patch not included?
Gtk+2.0 from Sarge is not affected by CVE-2005-2976, see #339431 for more information. It's mentioned because it applies to Woody. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]