> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 13:21, Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't really understand your question. There is no separate security > > archive for volatile, as I understand it. > > Oddly enough I understood Tony, yet I don't understand the > Volative+ClamAV situation. Can someone definatively state what is the > holdup/situation/reasoning for why the latest ClamAV release has been > pushed to all the mirrors but not updating via apt. >
From the ClamAV maintainer team's perspective I can only say that we uploaded the packages to the volatile archive (well, you noticed that the packages are there indeed), but for some reason they did not make their way into the Packages/Release files. I guess only the volatile archive maintainers can help out. Best, Michael
pgpr5muKAnq4D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
