> * Luk Claes: > > > Currently the security support for the volatile archive is supposed > > to be taken care of by the uploaders of the respective packages. > > > > I think it would make sense to have someone or a team tracking > > security issues for volatile. > > > > What do you think? Is anyone up to providing such issue tracking for > > volatile?
On 22.02.09 22:06, Florian Weimer wrote: > For ClamAV and ClamAV-derived packages, I'd prefer to see uploads of > new upstream versions to stable-security or stable-proposed-updates > (that is, remove it from volatile). May I know why? I think that volatile is exactly the place where they should be. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org