tl;dr

stfu and stop replying to this chain. This is debian-security, not
debian-childish-trolling.

My email earlier was to give a hint on where this was heading, and yet it
continues. If you have a problem with the way I handle my email, I'd rather
you'd reply personally to me rather than dragging the whole mailing list
into it.

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John Keimel <j...@keimel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Ashley Taylor <ash...@getdarker.com>
> wrote:
> > Sorry, this is the way Gmail handles replies.
> >
>
> No, it's the way YOU handle replies. Gmail happens to place the cursor
> at the top of the email, setting you up for a jeopardy reply. It's
> trivial to scroll down a little and type within the message in the
> proper location and avoid top-posting.
>
> I know this is the case because I'm doing it right now. And I even
> managed to delete the extraneous text that doesn't pertain to the
> conversation. Don't blame gmail for your laziness.
>
> > I hope it's annoying for you like these pointless e-peen stroking bitch
> > replies are agitating me (and yes, this is one of those replies).
>
> I don't do it because it's annoying to you, that's just an added bonus.
>
> Since the thread has already devolved and because anyone with a decent
> email client who doesn't want to see the thread continue has marked it
> dead, I thought that it wouldn't matter too much to reply and add to
> it. Match on a bonfire, as it were.
>
> I'd much rather see security discussions on this list, rather than
> having to educate people in the ways of how the intarwebs works, how
> to google and how to write a proper reply on a technical mailing list.
>
> Cheers!
>
> j
>

Reply via email to