Sounds clear. Riku Valli (riku.va...@vallit.fi) wrote [11.04.03 17:01]: | On 04/03/2011 03:24 AM, José Gregorio Díaz Unda wrote: | > Hi everyone. | > | > Why is that? | | This was my opion, because | http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/index.en.html | says at 4.4.6. Upgrading the system | | The upgrade process for other releases recommended the use of aptitude | for the upgrade. This tool is not recommended for upgrades from lenny to | squeeze. | | So i belive at apt-get today is better than aptitude solve depencies, | but some other people have opposite opions. May be these people are | right because at same chapter "This can be resolved by either using | aptitude to choose these packages for installation or by trying apt-get | -f install package." | | I hope at this clarify my opion, which may be misunderstand at facts. | | After i upgrade my system from Lenny to Squeeze. Aptitudes packet states | were messed and i must made lot of work to sync it again and apt-get | shows states right a way. So this strenghten my opion at apt-get is | better than aptitude, may be false way. | | Regards, Riku | | > | > Where can we find source info about this recomendation? | > | > Joseph. | > | > | > Enviado desde mi dispositivo movil BlackBerry® de Digitel. | > | > -----Original Message----- | > From: Riku Valli <riku.va...@vallit.fi> | > Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:12:19 | > To: <debian-security@lists.debian.org> | > Subject: Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade | > | > On 03/31/2011 04:23 PM, Benedikt Hallinger wrote: | >> Hi, | >> i noticed that too and switched back to apt-get for that reason. | > Hi | > | > apt-get is now preferred method over aptitude at Squeeze. However at | > Lenny aptitude is preferred over apt-get. | > | > You should use apt-get with Squeeze and aptitude with Lenny. | > | > Regards, Riku | > | >> | >> | >> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:49:19 +0200, Thomas Hungenberg | >> <th+lists-deb...@demonium.de> wrote: | >>> Hi, | >>> | >>> since upgrading from lenny to squeeze, I've noticed several times that | >>> aptitude | >>> does not install all available security updates whereas apt-get does. | >>> | >>> Currently, this looks like: | >>> | >>> # aptitude -s upgrade | >>> The following packages will be upgraded: | >>> bind9-host dnsutils libbind9-60 libdns69 libisc62 libisccc60 | >>> libisccfg62 liblwres60 | >>> 8 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. | >>> | >>> # apt-get -s upgrade | >>> Reading package lists... Done | >>> Building dependency tree | >>> Reading state information... Done | >>> The following packages will be upgraded: | >>> bind9-host dnsutils libbind9-60 libdns69 libisc62 libisccc60 | >>> libisccfg62 liblwres60 | >>> tex-common | >>> 9 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. | >>> | >>> What's the reason for this? | >>> | >>> - Thomas | >> | >> | > | > | | | -- | To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org | with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org | Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d982f96.3060...@vallit.fi |
-- Li Xin 2011-04-03 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110403114020.ga5...@some.com